In that time, he has taught nineteen graduate courses ranging from teaching methodology to educational statistics. His primary research interests are in the areas of foreign language vocabulary learning and teaching, and foreign language assessment. The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test.
The Columbia Spectator writer fired for plagiarizing from The New York Times earlier this month was actually employing a dishonest writing technique that is common on college campuses and among journalists.
A study directed by Rebecca Moore Howard, professor of writing and rhetoric at Syracuse University, suggests that much of the writing by college students is intellectually dishonest, but falls short of actual plagiarism.
She is preparing to publish her findings in a book. Patchwriting is often a failed attempt at paraphrasing, Howard said. Rather than copying a statement word for word, the writer is rearranging phrases and changing tenses, but is relying too heavily on the vocabulary and syntax of the source material.
In her study, called the Citation Project, Howard and her colleagues wanted to see exactly how students were using sources in their papers. Their theory is that if professors know what the weaknesses are, they can teach students to make better use of their sources.
Howard and her partners coded composition papers written by students enrolled at 16 different colleges, ranging from community colleges to Ivy League universities. Howard concluded that 17 percent of writing in the average college term paper is patchwriting.
She didn't find much plagiarism at all. I first heard Howard describe patchwriting at a conference on writing integrity earlier this year at Poynter.
And when I looked closely at her examples, I realized that journalists utilize patchwriting as well. At the very least, patchwriting is bad writing, she said.
And that might be the strongest reason that newsroom editors would object to it, although I concede that not all editors would object. Some would be just fine with this type of writing.
After all, we teach college students to write not because we expect them to become writers, but because writing is the evidence that they are mastering intellectual concepts.
What we expect of journalists is different. Based on those consultations, I believe most editors would deem patchwriting problematic, but not plagiarism. Patchwriting case study The quote lifting was what doomed the Spectator writer.
Here are the three paragraphs thank you Ivygateblog. But he did save just about everything — whether a doodle on a Plaza Hotel cocktail napkin of an imagined city on Ellis Island, his earliest pencil sketch of the spiraling Guggenheim Museum or a model of Broadacre City, his utopian metropolis.
The Spectator writer implied that she got that exact quote from the museum curator in an interview herself. But the other two paragraphs pose a more classic problem. She had interviewed the curator, as well as a librarian and other sources. But the side-by-side comparison made it clear that the writer was inappropriately using the New York Times piece as a crutch.
To me it's still pretty clear cut and it's completely unacceptable. You didn't have to start the story that way. Why is the rearranging without citation dishonest? Stealing the selection is stealing the intellectual work of that writer.
The problem for journalism But we do that all the time in journalism, I suspect we do it now even more than we used to. Because now, if you look at all the work that populates the marketplace of ideas, it is written by reporters, bloggers, aggregators, commentators, curmudgeons and both professional and amateur opiners.
A greater portion of that material is absent any original reporting and instead built upon the work of others.Faculty information and profiles for Temple University Japan's TESOL Graduate College of Education Program.
At the very least, patchwriting is bad writing, she said. And that might be the strongest reason that newsroom editors would object to it, although I concede that not all editors would object. STAT, April 6, Plagiarism Plagiarism is representing the words, creative work, or ideas of another person as one’s own without providing proper documentation of source.
Writing - Chapter 6: Plagiarism: How to Avoid It. How to Avoid Plagiarism. Furthermore, while it may seem tempting to purchase an essay from an online content mill or one of those websites promising to secure you a passing grade, this is not a good idea.
NoodleTools: Student research platform with MLA, APA and Chicago/Turabian bibliographies, notecards, outlining. 🔥Citing and more! Check for unintentional plagiarism, add citations directly into your paper, and get advanced grammar help.